Simulated Realities, Manipulated Perceptions

Submitted by Caroline Jaine








Twenty years ago, the French philosopher, sociologist and political commentator, Jean Baudrillard wrote an essay entitled “The Gulf War Did Not Take Place”.  Published in French and British Newspapers (Libération and The Guardian), it attracted huge criticism from people like Christopher Norris, who castigated Baudrillard and other postmodern intellectuals for arguing the Gulf conflict was unreal and essentially fictive. Some even labelled Baudrillard “a theoretical terrorist”.  He was not, however, in denial that lives were lost nor that “more explosives were dropped in the two months of the Gulf War than the entire allied air attacks in World War II”. His central issue was one of interpretation and the presentation of the facts through a media lens – his concern was whether these events could be called a war.For Baudrillard, the massive aerial bombardment of Iraq’s military and civil infrastructure was a war stripped of its passions and violence.  Sanitised of foul imagery and “stripped bare by its technicians,” it was then re-clothed by the “artifices of electronics, as though with a second skin”. His argument was that this conflict was won in advance and that as the “war” was presented to the public entirely via the media this provided no real evidence of its existence – “direct transmission by CNN of real time information is not sufficient to authenticate a war”. His point was that the Gulf War “as we have been led to understand it” did not exist.

Unlike the gloss of the Gulf War, twenty years on there is a new preoccupation in society to experience the gruesomeness of war. In 2009, artist Jeremy Deller plucked a bombed-out vehicle from Baghdad’s debris to tour around America – the Guardian wrote that he was putting the violence of Iraq “right under our noses”.  During the invasion of Iraq in 2003, we fed off bloggers like Salam Pax, who gave us the real-time, real-life trauma from Baghdad, and today our on-screen entertainment is often brought to us with the help of war-thirsty embedded journalists – who show us fear, danger, and how close death is.

Now, the Internet brings us as much blood and guts from the world’s trouble spots as we can manage.  We hear of Osama Bin Laden’s death in Pakistan, but we want imagery, we want Osama’s remains, however gruesome.  We want his head.  Only this will make it real. Even inaccessible violence – such as that in the north of Sri Lanka in 2006 – barred from the gaze of media and international organizations – is snapped by camera phones and spread via YouTube.  Like Bin Laden, the Tamil leader Prabhakaran’s caved-in head was clear for us all to see within hours of his death and now the horrors of spilt blood of the Tamil civilians is creeping onto our page.

The sensation of war and violence appears ever attractive to the news viewer.  Whilst Baudrillard made a clear statement about the sanitisation of the Gulf War, the advent of competition between internet and TV news sees a battle for who can dig deeper into vile suffering.  Starving children nolonger move us – the world’s cameras rest upon the bandaged head of a baby after a mortar attack, a limbless child, the close-up suffering of a grieving tear-stained widow.  However, our taste for the ghastly is nothing compared with those in Asia. Even ten years ago the Sri-Lankan press carried a front page photo of a severed head of a suicide bomber (the caption reading “did you know this man”?), and a recent visit to Pakistan revealed that whilst the nation is fed up with being constantly associated with terrorism, its newspapers at home enjoy a continual stream of bombs, murders, and riots.

My recent Pakistani trip took me to the city of Karachi. In preparation, my web research revealed the charred remains of bomb blast victims, graphically recorded assassinations, and news of angry fire-starters.  Even educated people told me I would be likely to be beheaded, kidnapped, and because of my interest in Islam and Pakistan I received hate mail from people telling me that I would be raped and killed (because that is what they do to Christians there).  Nobody at all could be trusted.

To my surprise, the Pakistani city I discovered was bursting with generosity and concern – endless cups of tea and food offerings. Shopping malls that were home to Italian cafes, McDonalds and Next outlets.  People going to work, kids going to school – not all of them to radical militant Madrassas, University students happily chatting and learning, pristine traffic cops efficiently directing traffic, eloquent business people, and young women who told me that “Karachi is a wonderful place to be a woman at the moment”.  Not to mention miles of golden sand overlooking the Indian Ocean – filled with child footballers, bathing families and smiling, waving people whenever I took out my camera.  Even in the Saddar district – a place I had been warned that I would not leave alive – we met many people who were not actually killing each other or engaged in bloody, violent acts.  Mostly they were getting on with their lives – running fruit stalls, sweeping the streets, driving buses.  We even encountered a heavy-set transvestite in a bright red sari, who quipped at my intrigue, “surely they have people like me in your country”?  Pakistan has just become one of the first countries in the world to officially recognize a third gender. We even visited an elegant Catholic Church.  My hunch is you won’t really get to hear about the churches in Pakistan unless they are blown up.

Like Baudrillard, I am not claiming that Pakistan is a country without its fair share of problems.  Nor that Karachi itself is not home to some extreme acts of violence, and even plays host to celebrity terrorists. I am not claiming that explosives have not been loaded into vehicles or strapped to the mentally ill and triggered.  Nor that people have died.  However, the reality of this particular city and its 18 million inhabitants is highly complex and perhaps impossible to present through a single media face. The overwhelming media narrative, fuelled by the discovery of Bin Laden, is that Pakistan is a “hotbed” of evil – which a cynic might claim is a perception equally as manipulated or at best contrived as the media coverage was during the Gulf War.

Baudrillard’s fascination was not with the event of war or truth of it per se – but with both the notion of reality and the erosion of that reality caused by technology and media. Perhaps the view that Pakistan Is Full Of Terrorists is fabricated for our own single-narrative-loving, bloodthirsty pallets – we are simple media consumers addicted to the distraction of disaster.  The French philosopher claimed that humans are naturally drawn towards a simulated version of reality – but has this gone too far? And can we control the simulation? As with the Gulf War, one cannot deny that lives have been lost and explosives done their worst in Pakistan, however, perhaps we should view the country not through the media lens of adrenalin-fuelled foreign correspondents, who tend to embed with Karachi ambulance drivers these days – but through other lenses.  Surely we have the ability to shift that reality, simulated or not.

18 Responses to “Simulated Realities, Manipulated Perceptions”

  1. Interesting included topic, a lot of interesting information.

  2. Right now it sounds like BlogEngine is the top blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?

  3. Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I want to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and precise effort to make an excellent article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.

  4. Interesting included topic, a lot of interesting information.

  5. Lona Shane says:

    Please let me know if you’re looking for a writer for your blog. You have some really good articles and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please shoot me an e-mail if interested. Kudos!

  6. fafrailla says:

    Willingly I accept. In my opinion, it is an interesting question, I will take part in discussion. Together we can come to a right answer.

  7. What a great web log. I spend hours on the net reading blogs, about tons of various subjects. I have to first of all give praise to whoever created your theme and second of all to you for writing what i can only describe as an fabulous article. I honestly believe there is a skill to writing articles that only very few posses and honestly you got it. The combining of demonstrative and upper-class content is by all odds super rare with the astronomic amount of blogs on the cyberspace.

  8. Hey! I just saw another message in another blog that regarded like this. How are you aware all this stuff? That’s one cool post.

  9. Hi. I needed to drop you a fast note to specific my thanks. Ive been following your weblog for a month or so and have picked up a ton of fine data and enjoyed the tactic youve structured your site. I’m attempting to run my very own weblog nevertheless I believe its too basic and I have to deal with a number of smaller topics. Being all issues to all of us is not all that its cracked up to be

    Lamp server download

  10. cheescert says:

    Very valuable idea

  11. This is the right weblog for anyone who wants to search out out about this topic. You realize so much its almost laborious to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You undoubtedly put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

  12. Quite right! Idea excellent, it agree with you.

  13. Hyman Ulven says:

    It’s arduous to search out knowledgeable folks on this topic, however you sound like you already know what you’re speaking about! Thanks

  14. This is one of the finest sites in this area. Look in here often and propose to all, because it is immensely recommended. It is rare that the admin pages so cared against certain dope on the time and its layout.

  15. Long the network can search as a service to sites with like content, there are multifarious alike resemble but something was missing. Here znalez³em everything – good basis written in an ready avenue poprarty knowledgeable. Certainly I was looking more and annex to the subscription.

  16. It is remarkable, very good message

  17. Maire Deluz says:

    Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thanks However I am experiencing issue with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting an identical rss drawback? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

Leave a Reply